Questions from a MOOC

Let’s look at the questions and reflections placed this week at MOOC The Place of Music in 21st Century.

1. You were introduced to the DAW (or sequencer), the step sequencer, and a range of notation software. Do you feel you would like to explore any of these technologies further?

As for DAW (Digital Audio Workstations) I need to take time to study them and thus increase my work horizon. I want to study Ableton Live.

The DAW I currently use for recording is Reaper. It’s free and has amazing features.

As for Step Sequencer, I don’t have much contact but I use an App called Soundcorset Tuner, Metronome & Recorder where I programmed Afro-Bahian rhythm Claves in the step sequencer this App has.

I have been using notation software for a long time. In my case I use Finale.

2. Have you been persuaded that the DJ-producer does have an awful lot of sophisticated musical skills?

Yes, but I thought that way before the course. It is very clear that today’s DJ-producers study much more music than in the past and musicians who have had formal education in the field are also entering this DJ’s universe, thus raising the bar for this kind of production.

However …. There are still many DJ’s who know nothing about music. But with the competitive market as we see the tendency of these is to disappear.

3. Do you agree with David Price that learning has gone “OPEN”?

Yes!! I mentioned this in another post HERE.

Open Education is significantly cheaper than traditional courses and you can do at your home. In short, it saves time, money and there is no need to leave home to be done. Eventually in some cases you have to take a few classes, usually on weekends, a few times during the course.

4. What were the best examples of OPEN learning that you found either in the course content, in your own searching, or the work of your peers?

The ones I discovered are these:

Bradesco Foundation (Portuguese Only)

Focused on the general job market.

EdX

Edx has a wide range of courses in several languages. I recommend looking at the course Artistic Research in Music – an Introduction

Future Learn

Site also with a wide range of courses in several languages. I recommend Becoming a Better Music Teacher from ABRSM

This Below was a colleague here from the course you indicated.

Open Learn

I found two good music courses to do when I have free time: Assessment in secondary music and Teaching secondary music

5. What does Project Based Learning (or the other BLs) have to offer Music Education? And what does Music Education have to offer Project Based Learning, and all learning, in the 21st Century

PBL’s help integrate areas of knowledge. For example: Nowadays there is a great demand for the musician’s career self-management, career self-disclosure, social networking etc … A good PBL involving digital communication and administration with students composing music and spreading music in social networks and managing costs of advertising, production and other elements.

Music can be an aggregating element of various elements of a BL. When students study various subjects and with the acquired knowledge they can make a composition and put Lyrics based on the studied subject, adding artistic value and practicing creativity.

There are instances of teachers who make music to help students learn topics of certain subjects.

Check it out this chemistry teacher who did some Brazilian Funk’s about the electrochemistry of batteries (portuguese)

See ya

Popular Music Education

One of the things that surprised me most when I entered the popular music college was the colleagues who played very well were professional musicians in search of deeper theoretical knowledge. Their quest was to understand musical structures in a more … structured way.

When I saw the video classroom music is an alien in The Place of Music course in 21st Century Education MOOC, I immediately remembered these colleagues. Especially when Hein says: “And I feel like, the way the pop musicians and the way that I learned, you learn actual songs and then only much later than you decompose them into their smallest constituent parts. Because it takes some sophistication to be able to do that.”

In this same MOOC the reading of this video is suggested. Check it out.

Lucy Green proposed a simple method, in theory, in which “The approach involves the pupil listening to a recording and attempting to play it by ear”. Method based on the way that popular musicians learn until today. More details on Lucy Green method can be seen here

Although music education is evolving to adapt to the new types of music that emerge we can not forget that traditional music teaching has existed for centuries, and if it lasts for so long there are certainly good reasons for that.

An interesting interview with João Camarero that talks about Brazilian music and how the popular universe merges with the traditional.

I believe that it is up to the teacher to know how to get the best of both worlds and adapt their lectures to each class / student. It is up to each one to think and see what his objectives are in teaching and to use the most appropriate method, whether it comes from the popular or traditional school.

Reflections on technology, education and the future.

About 12, 13 years ago I read a story in which the someone said that the most important thing in the future would be “learning to learn.” Unfortunately I did not find the magazine in which I read this, I only remember having found it fascinating.

This idea, as Stephen Heppell shows here, is not new (he published on his blog in 2013 and brings reports from 2011,2012). Information is increasingly available and the means of production increasingly accessible. Here is a reflection on the relationship of music, music education with these facts.

Just remember how much audio production cost 15-20 years ago. How expensive were the equipment needed for this kind of production. Today there are very cheap equipment and they deliver a professional quality.

Look at the the examples of Northern Beaches Christian Scholl and Hilltop Road Public School, both in Australia, given in the MOOC course The Place of Music in 21st Century Education, would it be possible to use such advanced technologies if the cost of having such equipment was the same as 10, 15 years ago? However, for a satisfactory result, our knowledge of how to operate each of these elements of this chain comes into play.

The lowest input cost is only one element of this equation. The knowledge widely available nowadays to operate these equipment’s, software’s and platforms are fundamental. The professional of the future has to retain knowledge of several areas to stay active in the market today. Basically, nowadays, a person assumes the role of several people in productions of the past.

It is there, I believe, that the role of technology enters into learning. Technology as Teo Chee Hean, quoted in Heppell’s text, “is more rapid than the typical timeline for educational research studies,” therefore one must think of an education in which people have access to the means of production that they should use in the future, which will certainly involve a lot of technology, and train those people to be able to quickly embrace change. After all, the world is changing faster and faster. Autonomy in this constant adaptation is an important tool for people these days, in the future will be key.

I believe that a full basic education, which includes music, is another important factor in this super complicated equation. The development of talents involving creativity and cooperation, fundamental elements of music, are fundamental. As Heppell said in his text: “In a world awash with content, much of it free, markets turned out to be about memberships and mutuality, whilst ingenuity and creativity were scarce and valued.”

Learn how to learn is the key to the future, and music is the way.